On Tue, 17 May 2005 00:15:42 PDT, Andrew Morton said: > So much has changed in there that we might have fixed it by accident, and I > do recall a couple of fundamental and subtle NMI bugs being fixed. So > yeah, it might be worth enabling it by default again. Care to send a patch > which does that? There's still boxes with borked LAPICs out there - or will the "borked lapic" code override the NMI handler?
Attachment:
pgpaYB27NpYVI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [PATCH] NMI lockup and AltSysRq-P dumping calltraces on _all_ cpus via NMI IPI
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] NMI lockup and AltSysRq-P dumping calltraces on _all_ cpus via NMI IPI
- From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] NMI watchdog config option (was: Re: [PATCH] NMI lockup and AltSysRq-P dumping calltraces on _all_ cpus via NMI IPI)
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] NMI watchdog config option (was: Re: [PATCH] NMI lockup and AltSysRq-P dumping calltraces on _all_ cpus via NMI IPI)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] NMI lockup and AltSysRq-P dumping calltraces on _all_ cpus via NMI IPI
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 build failure
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 - sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:2502
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] NMI watchdog config option (was: Re: [PATCH] NMI lockup and AltSysRq-P dumping calltraces on _all_ cpus via NMI IPI)
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] NMI watchdog config option (was: Re: [PATCH] NMI lockup and AltSysRq-P dumping calltraces on _all_ cpus via NMI IPI)
- Index(es):
 |