On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 02:04:42PM +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 05:57, Al Viro wrote:
>
> > That is not quite correct. You are passing very odd filp to ->ioctl()...
> > Old variant gave NULL, which is also not too nice, though.
>
> Which would you prefer? I guess that if there _are_ going to be
> problems, we'd be better off finding them early by passing in the NULL
> value.
For now I'd rather pass NULL. Longer term (== post 2.6.12, since There Is No
2.7(tm)) - just remove the struct file * argument of bdev ioctl and have
int flags used instead, with "opened for write" and "opened non-blocking"
passed in it. And switch the inode argument to bdev...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
