On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 08:38:45AM -0700, Sy, Dely L wrote:
> On Friday, May 13, 2005 3:36 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > The definition of GET_INDEX is suspect:
> > >
> > > #define GET_INDEX(a, b) (((a - PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_MCH_PA) << 3) +
> b)
> > >
> > > should this not be
> > >
> > > #define GET_INDEX(a, b) ((((a) - PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_MCH_PA) << 3) +
> \
> > > ((b) & 7))
> > >
> > > ?
> >
> > Dely, any thoughts about this, or know who would know about it?
>
> Greg,
>
> I looked at the code and talked with Steve on this. The fix is correct;
> i.e. b has to be masked with 7. Would Christoph or you send out a
> patch for the fix or would you like us to do so? Thanks for finding out
> the problem.
If you would send me a patch (or someone), that I could apply, I would
appreciate it.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
