--Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote (on Tuesday, May 17, 2005 00:15:42 -0700):
> Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> BTW, why NMI watchdog is disabled by default?
>
> There was a significantly large string of reports of dying PCs in the
> 2.4.early timeframe. These machines would mysteriously lock up after
> considerable periods of time and the problem was cured by disabling the NMI
> watchdog. Nobody was ever able to solve it, so we changed it to default to
> off.
>
> So much has changed in there that we might have fixed it by accident, and I
> do recall a couple of fundamental and subtle NMI bugs being fixed. So
> yeah, it might be worth enabling it by default again. Care to send a patch
> which does that?
There are some unfixable machine issues - for instance, the IBM
Netfinity 8500R corrupts one of the registers (ebx?) every time we get
an NMI for us, and panics. Probably other boxes you mention above have
similar issues? But it's not our code that's at fault ...
In light of this, I don't think it's a good idea to enable NMI by default,
at least not without a blacklist function of some sort?
M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
