On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 12:22:56AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Dinsdag 17 Mai 2005 00:27, Greg KH wrote:
> > Huh? ?We can handle syscalls in modules these days pretty simply. ?Look
> > at how nfs and others do it.
>
> Well afaics, nfs works around this issue by having fs/nfsctl.o always
> as a builtin and abstract the calls through a file system using
> read/write. That would be Ben's idea again, i.e. not actually
> using a system call.
>
> The only widely used module that I'm aware of ever implementing a system
> call was the TUX web accelerator that that used a hack in entry.S
> and its own dynamic registration.
Sorry, but I was thinking of the cond_syscall() stuff, to allow syscalls
in modules or code that just happens to not be built into the kernel.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
