Re: [PATCH 7/8] ppc64: SPU file system

On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 01:14:58PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
>     Greg> No, as Ben said, do not do this.  Use write.  And as you are
>     Greg> only doing 1 type of ioctl, it shouldn't be an issue.  Also
>     Greg> it will be faster than the ioctl due to lack of BKL usage :)
> 
> This is no longer true.  ioctls don't have to take the BKL now that
> struct file_operations has unlocked_ioctl and compat_ioctl.

Yes, but his patch did not use them :)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 0/8] ppc64: Introduce Cell/BPA platform, v2
  - From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 7/8] ppc64: SPU file system
  - From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 7/8] ppc64: SPU file system
  - From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 7/8] ppc64: SPU file system
  - From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: IA64 implementation of timesource for new time of day subsystem
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 7/8] ppc64: SPU file system
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 7/8] ppc64: SPU file system
Next by thread: [PATCH] libfs: add simple attribute files
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]