On Mon, 16 May 2005, john stultz wrote: > > No. I intend to preserve the existing functionality (and performance) of > the current code. The current timeofday core should allow for this (as I > described in my last mail), so really its just a matter of either me or > someone else getting around to properly converting that arch with the > help of the arch maintainer. Until the arch is really ready to use the > new timeofday core, no changes are necessary. Its not an arch specific issue. The time sources need to have a field that specifies that jitter protection is needed and there needs to be some logic to implement it. Otherwise we have to develop special functions for each timesource that deal with jitter protection. Function will make a fastcall for the clocks that use jitter protection not possible and thus timer access will slow down. > What I'm trying to shake out, with Christoph's help, is any major > limitations in the core timeofday code that would keep an arch from > being able to use it. I feel Christoph's concerns have been addressed, > but please let me know if you disagree. Please add jitter protection to the arch independent code. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IA64 implementation of timesource for new time of day subsystem
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: IA64 implementation of timesource for new time of day subsystem
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH (1/7)] new timeofday subsystem (v A5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH (2/7)] new timeofday i386 arch specific changes (v A5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH (3/7)] new timeofday x86-64 specific changes (v A5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH (4/7)] new timeofday i386 and x86-64 timesources (v A5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH (5/7)] new timeofday ia64,ppc32,ppc64 and s390 arch specific hooks (v A5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- IA64 implementation of timesource for new time of day subsystem
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: IA64 implementation of timesource for new time of day subsystem
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: IA64 implementation of timesource for new time of day subsystem
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: IA64 implementation of timesource for new time of day subsystem
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: IA64 implementation of timesource for new time of day subsystem
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: IA64 implementation of timesource for new time of day subsystem
- From: David Mosberger <[email protected]>
- Re: IA64 implementation of timesource for new time of day subsystem
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH (1/7)] new timeofday subsystem (v A5)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] namespace.c: fix bind mount from foreign namespace
- Next by Date: Re: crypto api initialized late
- Previous by thread: Re: IA64 implementation of timesource for new time of day subsystem
- Next by thread: Re: IA64 implementation of timesource for new time of day subsystem
- Index(es):