On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 10:40:04PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3-full/fs/ext2/ext2.h.old 2005-04-20 23:08:52.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3-full/fs/ext2/ext2.h 2005-04-20 23:14:21.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> > #include <linux/fs.h>
> > #include <linux/ext2_fs.h>
> > +#include <linux/buffer_head.h>
> >
> > /*
> > * second extended file system inode data in memory
> > @@ -79,6 +80,22 @@
> > return container_of(inode, struct ext2_inode_info, vfs_inode);
> > }
> >
> > +static int nibblemap[] = {4, 3, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1, 3, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 0};
> > +
>
> This will cause a copy of `nibblemap' to be included in each compilation
> unit which uses ext2.h. Unless the compiler is sufficiently smart to elide
> it, which it might be. But then it might be sufficiently smart to generate
> a "you're not usig this" warning too.
gcc never generates a warning because it's used in the "static inline"
function ext2_count_free (whether this function is used or not doesn't
matter).
But I get your point.
> If it's only needed for EXT2_DEBUG then I'd be inclined to move it into one
> of the other .c files, inside EXT2_DEBUG. Or just leave it as-is.
Sounds good.
Any suggestion into which file it should be moved?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
