Re: Linux does not care for data integrity (was: Disk write cache)

On Llu, 2005-05-16 at 12:12, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Sure you can waive rethorics around, but the fact is that linux is
> improving; there now is write barrier support for ext3 (and I assume
> reiserfs) for at least IDE and iirc selected scsi too. 

scsi supports tagging so ext3 at least is just fine.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Disk write cache (Was: Hyper-Threading Vulnerability)
    • From: Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]>
  • Re: Disk write cache (Was: Hyper-Threading Vulnerability)
    • From: Gene Heskett <[email protected]>
  • Re: Disk write cache (Was: Hyper-Threading Vulnerability)
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: Disk write cache
    • From: Kenichi Okuyama <[email protected]>
  • Re: Disk write cache
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Linux does not care for data integrity (was: Disk write cache)
    • From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux does not care for data integrity (was: Disk write cache)
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Linux does not care for data integrity
• Next by Date: Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
• Previous by thread: Re: Linux does not care for data integrity
• Next by thread: Re: Linux does not care for data integrity
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]