Re: Linux does not care for data integrity (was: Disk write cache)

On Llu, 2005-05-16 at 12:12, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Sure you can waive rethorics around, but the fact is that linux is
> improving; there now is write barrier support for ext3 (and I assume
> reiserfs) for at least IDE and iirc selected scsi too. 

scsi supports tagging so ext3 at least is just fine.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Disk write cache (Was: Hyper-Threading Vulnerability)
  - From: Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]>
- Re: Disk write cache (Was: Hyper-Threading Vulnerability)
  - From: Gene Heskett <[email protected]>
- Re: Disk write cache (Was: Hyper-Threading Vulnerability)
  - From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: Disk write cache
  - From: Kenichi Okuyama <[email protected]>
- Re: Disk write cache
  - From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Linux does not care for data integrity (was: Disk write cache)
  - From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux does not care for data integrity (was: Disk write cache)
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Linux does not care for data integrity
Next by Date: Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
Previous by thread: Re: Linux does not care for data integrity
Next by thread: Re: Linux does not care for data integrity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]