Matt Mackall wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 04:22:19AM -0700, Adam J. Richter wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2005 10:54:05 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:57:35PM CEST, I got a letter
where Matt Mackall <[email protected]> told me that...
Does this need an HTTP request (and round trip) per object? It appears
to. That's 2200 requests/round trips for my 800 patch benchmark.
Yes it does. On the other side, it needs no server-side CGI. But I guess
it should be pretty easy to write some kind of server-side CGI streamer,
and it would then easily take just a single HTTP request (telling the
server the commit ID and receiving back all the objects).
I don't understand what was wrong with Jeff Garzik's previous
suggestion of using http/1.1 pipelining to coalesce the round trips.
You can't do pipelining if you can't look ahead far enough to fill the pipe.
Even if you cannot fill a pipeline, HTTP/1.1 is sufficiently useful
simply by removing the per-request connection overhead.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
