Re: Mercurial 0.4e vs git network pull

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Petr Baudis wrote:
>>>remote HEAD you want to fetch, and the URL; see
>>>Documentation/git-http-pull.txt).
>>
[..]
> 
> It's in the git-pb and cogito trees. Linus is on holiday. :-)
> 

ah, thanks. (that's why "cg-update" returns so quickly ;-))

- --
BOFH excuse #266:

All of the packets are empty.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCh2bG+A7rjkF8z0wRAqWTAKCO2SW1Ax5+HPrMa6pTQCj/PaQ5mQCfUcKe
f9oyyKbdVTdxpEKGgbSKNIM=
=0YP6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: Mercurial 0.4e vs git network pull
    • From: Petr Baudis <[email protected]>
  • Re: Mercurial 0.4e vs git network pull
    • From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
  • Re: Mercurial 0.4e vs git network pull
    • From: Petr Baudis <[email protected]>
  • Re: Mercurial 0.4e vs git network pull
    • From: Christian Kujau <[email protected]>
  • Re: Mercurial 0.4e vs git network pull
    • From: Petr Baudis <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Disk write cache (Was: Hyper-Threading Vulnerability)
• Next by Date: Re: Disk write cache (Was: Hyper-Threading Vulnerability)
• Previous by thread: Re: Mercurial 0.4e vs git network pull
• Next by thread: Re: Mercurial 0.4e vs git network pull
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]