On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 03:01:03PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 02:20:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Then someone needs to convince Linus to export touch_nmi_watchdog
> > again.
> >
> > Or how about checking if interrupts are off here (iirc we have
> > a generic function for that now) and then using
> > a smaller timeout and otherwise schedule_timeout() ?
>
> The interrupt state doesn't tell us whether we can schedule. It
> tells us when we can't schedule, which is different from when we
> can. For example:
Yes, you're right of course. Must have not been thinking clearly.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
