Re: Does smp_reschedule_interrupt really reschedule?

* Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:

> In finish_task_switch, where is need_resched set?

why should it be set? It's the final portion of a context-switch, not 
the initiator of a context-switch. need_resched is usually set by the 
wakeup code, or by the preemption code.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does smp_reschedule_interrupt really reschedule?
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>

References:
- Does smp_reschedule_interrupt really reschedule?
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: Does smp_reschedule_interrupt really reschedule?
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Does smp_reschedule_interrupt really reschedule?
  - From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] namespace.c: fix bind mount from foreign namespace
Next by Date: Re: tickle nmi watchdog whilst doing serial writes.
Previous by thread: Re: Does smp_reschedule_interrupt really reschedule?
Next by thread: Re: Does smp_reschedule_interrupt really reschedule?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]