On Fri, 13 May 2005 15:07:04 MDT, Chris Friesen said: > Because that's what the maximum negative number gives? Good, somebody's paying attention. :) So what breaks if we change it to an 'unsigned int', and can we fix those issues before 2038, and will any of us here now *care* when an unsigned 32-bit overflows in 2106 or whenever it is? :)
Attachment:
pgpZcspaJSYEu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Y2K-like bug to hit Linux computers! - Info of the day
- From: David Lang <[email protected]>
- Re: Y2K-like bug to hit Linux computers! - Info of the day
- References:
- Y2K-like bug to hit Linux computers! - Info of the day
- From: "Srinivas G." <[email protected]>
- Re: Y2K-like bug to hit Linux computers! - Info of the day
- From: Denis Vlasenko <[email protected]>
- Re: Y2K-like bug to hit Linux computers! - Info of the day
- From: "Richard B. Johnson" <[email protected]>
- Re: Y2K-like bug to hit Linux computers! - Info of the day
- From: "Richard B. Johnson" <[email protected]>
- Re: Y2K-like bug to hit Linux computers! - Info of the day
- From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
- Re: Y2K-like bug to hit Linux computers! - Info of the day
- From: [email protected]
- Re: Y2K-like bug to hit Linux computers! - Info of the day
- From: Chris Friesen <[email protected]>
- Y2K-like bug to hit Linux computers! - Info of the day
- Prev by Date: Re: Sync option destroys flash!
- Next by Date: Re: How to diagnose a kernel memory leak
- Previous by thread: Re: Y2K-like bug to hit Linux computers! - Info of the day
- Next by thread: Re: Y2K-like bug to hit Linux computers! - Info of the day
- Index(es):
 |