On Gwe, 2005-05-13 at 19:58, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> is available at http://www.kvack.org/~bcrl/simple-aio-min_nr.c).
> Before this patch __delay() is the number one entry in oprofile
> results for this workload. Does this look like a reasonable approach
> for chipsets that aren't completely braindead? Cheers,
If your chipset implements the 400nS lockout in hardware it certainly
seems to make sense. Nice to know someone has put it in hardware
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
