Re: Again: UML on s390 (31Bit)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
Meanwhile I've tried.

Your patch absolutely doesn't change host's behavior in the situation,
that is relevant to UML.


And as I understand that is because the SIGTRAP is not delivered
by the normal signal mechanism.
Yes.

BTW: I still can't see any loop in the kernel, that could call
do_signal() multiple times without returning to user in between.
For my understanding: do I miss something? If so, where is the loop?

Regards
	Bodo



I've prepared and attached a small program that easily can reproduce
the problem. I hope this will help to find a viable solution.


That is cool, thanks. Will certainly speed up debugging on my side.

blue skies,
   Martin

Martin Schwidefsky
Linux for zSeries Development & Services
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux