RE: [uClinux-dev] [Benchmark] Linux 2.6.11.6 ARM MMU mode vs. noMMU mode vs. MVista 2.4.20

["Wayne Lee" <wnlee@cad.csie.ncku.edu.tw>]

Hello Hyok,

How can we reproduce your experiments on s3c24a0 ports?
Do you release the lmbench for s3c24a0?

Regards,
Wayne

-----Original Message-----
From: uclinux-dev-bounces@uclinux.org
[mailto:uclinux-dev-bounces@uclinux.org] On Behalf Of Hyok S. Choi
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 10:36 AM
To: uClinux development list; linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: CE Linux Developers List
Subject: [uClinux-dev] [Benchmark] Linux 2.6.11.6 ARM MMU mode vs. noMMU
mode vs. MVista 2.4.20

FYI,

I just put an newer lmbench lat_ctx benchmark result chart,
among linux 2.6.11.6 noMMU mode vs. MMU mode vs. montavista
linux(2.4.20-mvista) at:
http://opensrc.sec.samsung.com/document/ctx-perf-linux-2.6.11.6.pdf

you can find some graphs also at :
http://opensrc.sec.samsung.com/document.html

Hyok



_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/