On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:59:59AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> The latest patches seem to do tick skipping rather than wholesale
> ticklessness. Admittedly, the latter is a more invasive change, but one
If you are referring to my i386 patch, that was only a hack to test the
scheduler change!
> that may end up being simpler in the long run. But maybe George did a
> design like that in the past and rejected it?
--
Thanks and Regards,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM Software Labs,
Bangalore, INDIA - 560017
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
