Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets+hotplug+preepmt broken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nathan asked:
> Won't holding cpuset_sem while calling cpuset_cpus_allowed cause a
> deadlock?

It definitely would, which is why Dinakar's patch both added a call to
get cpuset_sem earlier in the hot unplug code, as well as removed the
call to get cpuset_sem that was inside the cpuset_cpus_allowed code (as
well as modified the other caller of cpuset_cpus_allowed, the
sched_setaffinity code, to explicitly get cpuset_sem before calling
cpuset_cpus_allowed, since that call no longer acquired cpuset_sem on
its own.


-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux