Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc4 1/3] dynamic sysfs callbacks

On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 03:16:15PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> +#define __ATTR(_name,_mode,_show,_store) {	\
> +	.attr = {				\
> +		.name = __stringify(_name),	\
> +		.mode = _mode,			\
> +		.private = NULL,		\

We don't specifically initialise elements to NULL or zero.  Is this a
change of policy?

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc4 1/3] dynamic sysfs callbacks
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 2.6.12-rc4 1/3] dynamic sysfs callbacks
    • From: Yani Ioannou <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc4 1/3] dynamic sysfs callbacks
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/4] rt_mutex: add new plist implementation
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc4 1/3] dynamic sysfs callbacks
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc4 1/3] dynamic sysfs callbacks
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]