On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 16:03 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 02:48 +0700, Rudolf Usselmann wrote:
> > All my problems started when I "upgraded" to x86_64 ...
> >
>
> And you are surprised by this?
>
> I don't know why so many users buy an arch that didn't exist two years
> ago and expect it to be 100% as reliable as 32 bit i386 which has been
> around for 20 plus years. I see tons of bug reports where people don't
> bother to mention that "oh, btw this is a mixed 32/64 bit environment"
> or whatever.
>
> When you make the choice to live on the bleeding edge, these things will
> happen. If you don't like filling out bug reports stick with a 32 bit
> machine ;-)
>
> Lee
Hi Lee,
no I am not surprised ! But, hey, if nobody tries, we will
never debug it, right ?! ;*)
I did fill out a bug report several month ago (and did not mind
it), I was just following up because I didn't hear anything about
it in quite sometime !
Best Regards,
rudi
=============================================================
Rudolf Usselmann, ASICS World Services, http://www.asics.ws
Your Partner for IP Cores, Design, Verification and Synthesis
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
