On Tue, 10 May 2005 09:54 am, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> Con Kolivas ([email protected]) wrote on 9 May 2005 21:47:
> >Perhaps if I make the prio_bias multiplied instead of added to the cpu
> > load it will be less affected by SCHED_LOAD_SCALE. The attached patch
> > was confirmed during testing to also provide smp distribution according
> > to nice on 4x.
>
> It seems to work. I've tested it for a few hours on the same machine
> and the 2 nice 0 processes take the bulk of the cpu time, while that
> cpu bound program running at nice 19 takes only about 7%.
>
> Maybe it's a bit early to say it's fine, but it does semm much better
> than before, so I think it should go into the tree.
>
> Thanks a lot!
My pleasure. Thanks for testing.
I'll roll up these patches for rc4 and make smp nice balancing a config option
for ultimate flexibility.
Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]