Re: [ck] Re: [PATCH] implement nice support across physical cpus on SMP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 10 May 2005 09:54 am, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> Con Kolivas ([email protected]) wrote on 9 May 2005 21:47:
>  >Perhaps if I make the prio_bias multiplied instead of added to the cpu
>  > load it will be less affected by SCHED_LOAD_SCALE. The attached patch
>  > was confirmed during testing to also provide smp distribution according
>  > to nice on 4x.
>
> It seems to work. I've tested it for a few hours on the same machine
> and the 2 nice 0 processes take the bulk of the cpu time, while that
> cpu bound program running at nice 19 takes only about 7%.
>
> Maybe it's a bit early to say it's fine, but it does semm much better
> than before, so I think it should go into the tree.
>
> Thanks a lot!

My pleasure. Thanks for testing.

I'll roll up these patches for rc4 and make smp nice balancing a config option 
for ultimate flexibility.

Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux