On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 14:16 -0700, Andre Eisenbach wrote:
> 2005/5/10, Matthias-Christian Ott <[email protected]>:
> >
> > What about nanosleep ()?
> >
>
> nanosleep() seems to have some latency very similar to usleep(). Isn't
> usleep based on nanosleep()?
>
> Here's what I get if I try to nanosleep for 5 secs (for testing):
>
> -> 5.009952 s
>
> The .009952 part varies, but is very close to that usually.
Is this a 2.4 kernel? The resolution on 2.6 should be 1ms, not ~10ms.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
