On Tue, 10 May 2005 22:08:11 +0200, Peter Zijlstra said: > How about having another boolean indicating the ability to flip the > selector boolean. This boolean would be set false on an actual flip and > cleared during a grace period. That way the flips cannot ever interfere > with one another such that the callbacks would be cleared prematurely. As all the dining philosophers grab a fork and a spoon and dig in. ;)
Attachment:
pgpk174HuRF27.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [RFC] RCU and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT progress
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] RCU and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT progress
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [RFC] RCU and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT progress
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC/PATCH] unregister_node() for hotplug use
- Next by Date: High res timer?
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] RCU and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT progress
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] RCU and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT progress
- Index(es):