On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 11:39, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote:
>
> I guess I am still very biased by my implementation, where returning
> that was almost free because of how the functions where implemented
> (which steamed from the fact that they had to always compute the
> new priority to store it in the head).
>
> So as you say, the best way is wrapping your primitives around. I'd
> suggest a shorter postfix, something like _prio() or _chkprio().
I still say re-implementation of plist is a waste .. Why re-make the
wheel when you have a perfectly good starting point .
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
