On Tuesday 10 May 2005 01:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Blaisorblade <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Here are some more fixes intended for 2.6.12 (and well tested). Can you
> > merge them soon, Andrew? Thanks.
>
> Sure.
> > The first is a particularly bad one since it shows up when you *start*
> > compiling UML (due to a quilt patch -> normal patch conversion problem, a
> > file wasn't actually deleted, but it was when applied through quilt). Was
> > this too quick a merge, maybe? What's your "merging policy" (if any) for
> > patches?
> Jeff sent in fixes which were dependent on other things I had, we're maybe
> several weeks away from 2.6.12,
Several weeks away? Ok, that's nice to know, so we are not in a hurry
(especially since I'm totally busy). When I'll have time I'll flush out the
rest of what I have in my tree.
> so I figured there was plenty of time to
> get things fixed up - best to get it all flushed out and fix any fallout
> rather than hang around, given that UML seems to be still changing in
> fairly significant ways.
Ok, I had guessed we were near to the release instead.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
