Re: Any work in implementing Secure IPC for Linux?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 9 May 2005, Kristian Sørensen wrote:

> On Monday 09 May 2005 19:54, Chris Friesen wrote:
> > Kristian Sørensen wrote:
> > >  By "secure IPC" is meaning a
> > > security mechanism that provides a more fine granularity of specifying
> > > who are allowed to send (or receive) messages... and maby also a way to
> > > resolve the question of "Can I trust the message I received?"
> >
> > How about unix sockets?
> > 	--you can have sockets in the filesystem namespace with regular file
> > permissions to control who is allowed to send messages to particular
> > addresses
> This is the same problem: Basing access control on user and group is not 
> enough - especially as the root-user can overrule any access control 
> specified by the normal DAC file attributes.

You want MAC, in other words.

SELinux probably does what you want with fine grained MAC for Unix domain
networking and SO_PEERSEC for peer authentication.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<[email protected]>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux