Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 May 2005, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > This patch adds new plist implementation, see
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111547290706136
> >
> > Changes:
> >
> > added plist_next_entry() helper (was plist_entry)
> >
> > added plist_unhashed() helper, see PATCH 4/4
> >
>
> Naw , stick with Inaky's API ..
This patch breaks Inaky's API anyway, plist_del() now has only one
argument, and I think this is good.
I don't mind doing s/plist_next_entry/plist_entry/ if you wish,
but I think this is consistent with plist_next/plist_prev helpers.
And original plist_empty() is confusing. When used on plist's head
it is ok, but it is wrong to use plist_empty(&plist_node).
> Your stuff looks nothing like list.h ..
Is it bad?
Yes, plist_empty/plist_unhashed mimics hlist_empty/hlist_unhashed.
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
