Re: 2.6.11.8 + UML/x86_64 (2.6.12-rc3+) = oops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Antoine Martin <[email protected]> writes:

>> (..)
>> That is a wrmsr to 0x00000000c0000102 (KERNEL_GS_BASE), the code 
>> is trying to write 0x0000c8e816000002 into it. That is a non canonical
>> address, which causes the GPF.
>> 
>> The strange thing is that the kernel should have rejected it in
>> the first place. The code to allow user space to set kernel gs 
>> checks for the address being > TASK_SIZE and TASK_SIZE is 0x800000000000.
>> It should have rejected it in the first place.
>> 
>> Are you sure you did not apply any strange UML related patches
>> to the host kernel? Maybe those are buggy.
> The only extra patch applied on top of what is on the web page (as per
> Jeff's instructions) is the mconsole-exec patch, and AFAIK it wouldn't
> affect the code above.
>
> Alexander Nyberg is also experiencing crashes, aren't you?


Ok, the bug is found now. It is a kernel bug that it allows to set
non canonical addresses in 64bit segment registers through ptrace.

But even if I fixed that then it will not help you run UML, because
UML needs to set correct addresses of course, not illegal ones.

I will submit a patch later for the crash problem.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux