On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 02:11 -0400, Haoqiang Zheng wrote:
> Certainly, this very problem can be solved by setting the priority of
> X to nice -10 (like what Redhat etc. does).
This just flips the priority inversion around: the nice -10 X server
will consume all available CPU rendering on behalf xscreensaver, running
at nice 20.
I would like to test this code very much, as this has been a real
problem for me.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
