RE: [patch 1/1] Do not enforce unique IO_APIC_ID for Xeonprocessors in EM64T mode (x86_64)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 6 May 2005, Protasevich, Natalie wrote:

> Would the APIC version be a good criteria to make a run-time decision
> with Xeons? I know that everything Intel that can run EM64T has front
> side bus (APIC version >= 20?). And I guess the boot parameter can still
> be useful?

 Isn't there a bit in one of the I/O APIC registers which denotes that FSB 
delivery is used?  Hmm, that would be "IO_APIC_reg_00.bits.delivery_type", 
actually...

  Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux