On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 02:05 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Andries Brouwer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 01:10:09AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > > * Andries Brouwer ([email protected]) wrote:
> > > > No, there is no problem but an intentional change in behaviour in -mm
> > > > and now also in 2.6.11.8.
> > >
> > > I think this should be backed out of -stable.
> >
> > I was surprised to find it in, after I had written
> >
> > ============
> > Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 21:58:07 +0200
> >
> > For the time being, although I do not object to the patch,
> > obviously, since it is my own, I cannot see any reason to
> > add it to the "fixed" release.
> > ============
> >
> > but maybe including it was done by mistake?
> > It wasn't mentioned, I think, in the changelog.
> >
> > There was a report that it fixed an oops,
> > but the report is unconfirmed and ununderstood.
> >
> > Should it be backed out of 2.6.11.8? Possibly - but if it will be
> > part of 2.6.12 or 2.6.13 then I would be inclined to leave it.
> >
> > Andrew asks whether it should be removed from -mm.
>
> It was merged into Linus's tree on March 8th (via bk, thank gawd. How do
> you find out that sort of info using git? Generating a full log is
> cheating).
You can get the commit-history for a file out of the web interface.
Here's another example, cause this change is not in the repository:
http://www.kernel.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=history;f=lib/kobject.c
Thanks,
Kay
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
