Re: [PATCH] __wait_on_freeing_inode fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Compile tested only.  This condition is very hard to trigger normally
> (simultaneous clear_inode() with iget()) so probably only heavy stress
> testing can reveal any change of behavior.

Well, my stress test works fine with your patch. I've tested it on JFFS2
FS which works on top of RAM-emulated flash. I tried it together with my
patch since otherwise the stress test crashes due to the race that my
patch fixes.

On vanilla linux-2.6.11.5 the stress test usually crashes in about 5
minutes, but linux-2.6.11.5 + the 2 patches (as well as + only one my
patch) it is stable for 2 hours already.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityuckiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux