On Thu, 05 May 2005 17:22:47 +0200, Adrian Bunk said: > Your presumption is only correct starting with 2.6.12-rc3-mm1, because > since 2.6.12-rc3-mm1 the announcements do no longer contain the big > detailed listing of all patches in -mm. Note to self: Ingest caffeine, *THEN* do statistics. :) I *thought* the last few -mm announces looked different, couldn't put my finger on what though ;) OK.. Adding the number of 'All NNN patches' to the -rc3-mm*: 2.6.12-rc1-mm1 2345 2.6.12-rc1-mm2 3048 2.6.12-rc1-mm3 2861 2.6.12-rc1-mm4 2612 2.6.12-rc2-mm1 2460 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 2610 2.6.12-rc2-mm3 2763 2.6.12-rc3-mm1 2199 2.6.12-rc3-mm2 1083 2.6.12-rc3-mm3 1721 It's still looking slimmed down. ;)
Attachment:
pgppff1o8cdgy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm3
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm3
- References:
- Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm3
- From: [email protected]
- Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm3
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm3
- Prev by Date: Re: Extremely poor umass transfer rates
- Next by Date: Re: /proc/ide/hd?/settings obsolete in 2.6.
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm3
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm3
- Index(es):