Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm3

On Thu, 05 May 2005 17:22:47 +0200, Adrian Bunk said:

> Your presumption is only correct starting with 2.6.12-rc3-mm1, because 
> since 2.6.12-rc3-mm1 the announcements do no longer contain the big 
> detailed listing of all patches in -mm.

Note to self:  Ingest caffeine, *THEN* do statistics. :) I *thought* the
last few -mm announces looked different, couldn't put my finger on what though ;)

OK.. Adding the number of 'All NNN patches' to the -rc3-mm*:

2.6.12-rc1-mm1 2345
2.6.12-rc1-mm2 3048
2.6.12-rc1-mm3 2861
2.6.12-rc1-mm4 2612
2.6.12-rc2-mm1 2460
2.6.12-rc2-mm2 2610
2.6.12-rc2-mm3 2763
2.6.12-rc3-mm1 2199
2.6.12-rc3-mm2 1083
2.6.12-rc3-mm3 1721

It's still looking slimmed down. ;)

Attachment: pgppff1o8cdgy.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm3
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm3
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm3
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Extremely poor umass transfer rates
• Next by Date: Re: /proc/ide/hd?/settings obsolete in 2.6.
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm3
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]