Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains (v0.5)

On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 05:28:20PM -0700, Matthew Dobson wrote:
> 
> build_disjoint_sched_domains(partition1, partition2)?  Or just
> partition_sched_domains(partition1, partition2)?  Partition and disjoint
> seem mildly redundant to me, for varying definitions of partition... ;)

partition_sched_domains sounds fine to me, Thanks

	-Dinakar
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains (v0.5)
    • From: Dinakar Guniguntala <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains (v0.5)
    • From: Matthew Dobson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains (v0.5)
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains (v0.5)
    • From: Matthew Dobson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: copy_to_user question
• Next by Date: Re: Scheduler: SIGSTOP on multi threaded processes
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains (v0.5)
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains (v0.5)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]