Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 5/4/05, Dave Hansen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I think the general opinion of posting patches as attachments
>> has changed over the last few years. Mailers have been getting
>> a lot better at handling them, even quoting non-message-body
>> plain/text attachments in replies.
>
> What, Linus updated his pine?????
Pine is usurally better for handling patches than other mailers.
In pine, you can save a message into a mbox using very few keystrokes,
and if the patches are not encoded, patch can parse them from there.
BTW: I wrote a tool for handling MIME mails. Originally it was intended to
catch spam in procmail, but it can safe the individual parts into seperate
files, too. Maybe this is usefull:
http://7eggert.dyndns.org/~7eggert/hp/l/spam+mail/mime-analyzer/
(You'd use "cd $destdir && formail < $mbox -s mail-analyzer -copy_all -")
--
According to my calculations the problem doesn't exist.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
