Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy

On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 10:01:56AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> 
> I think the general opinion of posting patches as attachments
> has changed over the last few years.  Mailers have been getting
> a lot better at handling them, even quoting non-message-body
> plain/text attachments in replies.  

Personally, I hate seeing patches as attachments.  No offense, but
I hope this patch is ignored.

John
-- 
John W. Linville
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
    • From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
• Next by Date: Re: macro in linux/compiler.h pollutes gcc __attribute__ namespace
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]