Re: [RCF] [PATCH] unprivileged mount/umount

> > This (lightly tested) patch against 2.6.12-rc* adds some
> > infrastructure and basic functionality for unprivileged mount/umount
> > system calls.
> 
> most of this unprivileged mount policy can be handled by a suid
> userspace helper (e.g. pmount)

Yes.  This patch was created because certain people (including myself
to some extent) don't like that approach.

> what are the pros/cons of handling that in the kernel?

pro:

  - mount would still work in "suidless" private namespace

con:

  - kernel bloat

I'm sure there are others, they just elude me for the moment :)

Thanks,
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RCF] [PATCH] unprivileged mount/umount
    • From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RCF] [PATCH] unprivileged mount/umount
    • From: Martin Waitz <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RCF] [PATCH] unprivileged mount/umount
• Next by Date: A patch for the file kernel/fork.c
• Previous by thread: Re: [RCF] [PATCH] unprivileged mount/umount
• Next by thread: Re: [RCF] [PATCH] unprivileged mount/umount
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]