Re: Empty partition nodes not created (was device node issues with recent mm's and udev)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/3/05, Bodo Eggert <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Joe <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Here is the partition table from fdisk, fdisk does run fine.. its just
> > the fact this node is not created that threw me off before.
> >
> >    Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
> > /dev/sdb1   *           1           2       16033+   0  Empty
> > /dev/sdb2   *           6        2431    19486845    b  W95 FAT32
> > /dev/sdb3               3           5       24097+  83  Linux
> >
> > Notice, /dev/sdb1 is a Empty partition... in /dev I only have sdb,
> > sdb2, and sdb3.  No sdb1.  Any help would be appreciated.
> 
> Some vendors depend on empty partitions not showing up. That's why this
> patch was introduced.

It would be interesting to see just how important it is to hide this. 
 
> BTW: Is there a special reason you why choose "empty"?
> Is this partition showing up in other systems at all?

Actually, yes there is.. its a firmware partition that would normally
not be mounted, but in order to dd new firmware versions to it, I
depended on the node... which has ceased to exist.

I would like to see an easier workaround then just ignoring it like
that, but if its really needed....

Anyways, thanks everyone for the info, its much appreciated.

Joe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux