Re: question about contest benchmark

On Tue, 03 May 2005 14:29:59 EDT, Lee Revell said:

> But, it seems to me that even if an interactive process briefly goes CPU
> bound (due to bloat, bugs, or intent), it should still be scheduled
> preferentially to a pure CPU bound process like a build.

So you want it to schedule that big image (Evolution) that's already used 5
minutes of CPU since it started (this morning, admittedly) in preference to
that cc1 process that will be gone before it's used 2 seconds of CPU, plus all
the disk I/O that cc1 performs (hopefully the cache will help here, but it may
indeed go to disk to read the source files)?

Attachment: pgp4AUD7GnvMf.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: question about contest benchmark
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

• References:
  • question about contest benchmark
    • From: Haoqiang Zheng <[email protected]>
  • Re: question about contest benchmark
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] dynamic wep keys for airo.c
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm2: fs/proc/task_mmu.c warnings
• Previous by thread: Re: question about contest benchmark
• Next by thread: Re: question about contest benchmark
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]