Dinakar wrote:
> As far as I can see only the ones marked "<----" should be under the
> dentry lock, considering the fact that it already holds the cpuset_sem
> all the while.
It looks that way to me, too.
I doubt we had any particular reason for locking entry as early
as we do in that code.
It's ok by me if you move the dentry lock lower, as you suggest.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
