Re: [PATCH] i386: handle iret faults better

> I really ended up deciding that we can fix it with a simple one-liner 
> instead, which actually simplifies and cleans up the code, instead of 
> adding new special cases.
> 
> I just committed the appended, which actually removes one line more than 
> it adds.

Thanks looks great. I will add the equivalent to x86-64.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] i386: handle iret faults better
    • From: Roland McGrath <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: handle iret faults better
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Remove struct reclaim_state
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] I2C rtc8564.c remove duplicate include (whitespace fixed)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: handle iret faults better
• Next by thread: [PATCH] x86_64: handle iret faults better
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]