Re: [PATCH]porting lockless mce from x86_64 to i386

[Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>]

Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 11:31:25AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>  > Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> wrote:
>  > >
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > Doing it either way should be OK with this mce code. But I feel, 
>  > >  > despite of the patch size, it is better to keep all the shared 
>  > >  > code in i386 tree and link it from x86-64. Otherwise, it may become 
>  > >  > kind of messy in future, with various links between i386 and x86-64.
>  > > 
>  > >  i386 already uses code from x86-64 (earlyprintk.c) - it is nothing 
>  > >  new.
>  > 
>  > I must say I don't like the bidirectional sharing either.
> 
>  Why exactly?

One reason is that it makes it harder to locate the code.  I ctag each of
my architecture trees only with stuff from ./arch/that-architecture to reduce
duplicate hits.  So I end up with some x86 functions being unlocatable in
the x86 tree.  We end up with both x86_64 and x86 being broken in this
regard.

But that's a relatively minor point.  The major point is that it gives me
the creeps in hard-to-define ways ;)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/