Re: [2.6 patch] remove BK documentation

Uttered Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>, spake thus:

> Documentation authors really should mention themselves in the 
> introduction, docs aren't sexy and don't get your name in the news, but 
> they are a vital part of making Linux usable.

If you'd like to volunteer for the Fedora Documentation Project over at 

	http://fedora.redhat.com/docs

we may be able to overcome the rest the shortcomings you mentioned ;-)

Attachment: pgpYf2BWbClG2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• References:
  • [2.6 patch] remove BK documentation
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] remove BK documentation
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] remove BK documentation
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains (v0.5)
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains (v0.5)
• Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] remove BK documentation
• Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] remove BK documentation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]