On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 04:10:12AM -0400, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Why don't you try it, and post the numbers?
*Sigh*
Done from a test machine I have over here on a two node cluster.
I rebooted and re-formatted between tests.
* Without LKM_LOCAL:
[root@ca-test7 ocfs2]# time tar -zxf /tmp/linux-2.6.11.7.tar.gz
real 0m39.699s
user 0m3.644s
sys 0m8.076s
* With LKM_LOCAL
[root@ca-test7 ocfs2]# time tar -zxf /tmp/linux-2.6.11.7.tar.gz
real 0m22.076s
user 0m3.869s
sys 0m7.234s
So yes, I'd say it's worth a significant amount of performance to us :)
--Mark
--
Mark Fasheh
Senior Software Developer, Oracle
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
