Re: which ioctls matter across filesystems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robert Love wrote:

So a client adds a watch and the server needs to then physically add the
inotify watch?

Yes, this creates the interesting situation of two responses (one from the local client code, and one from the server) potentially coming as a client changes a file which he has a watch on.

If you have a user-space, user-space could just add an inotify watch.

But I guess you live entirely in kernel-space?  Couldn't we just export
our "add watch" interface to you?

	Robert Love

Yes - add watch could be exported, I don't see a way around this since a filesystem has to be able to tell the server what to watch. It does not really matter if that were done in kernel or not, but I would prefer it to be done in kernel since that would avoid having to ioctl down to the kernel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux