* Christopher Warner ([email protected]) wrote: > Any updated information one should know about this before testing? Andi would like to see output from this patch: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111461231610952&w=2 thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- From: Christopher Warner <[email protected]>
- Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6 upgrade overall failure report
- Next by Date: Re: Serial Mouse in Kernel 2.6
- Previous by thread: Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- Next by thread: Re: x86-64 bad pmds in 2.6.11.6 II
- Index(es):
 |