Re: [PATCH] private mounts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 00:00, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > ok. Generally overmounts are done on the root dentry of the topmost
> > vfsmount.  But in this case, your patch mounts it on the same dentry
> > as that of the private mount.
> > 
> > Essentially I was always under the assertion that 'a dentry can hold
> > only one vfsmount'.  But invisible mount seem to invalidate that
> > assertion.
> 
> You can do that without an invisible mount:
> 
> mkdir /tmp/mnt
> mkdir /tmp/dir1
> mkdir /tmp/dir1/subdir1
> mkdir /tmp/dir2
> mkdir /tmp/dir2/subdir2
> 
> cd /tmp/mnt
> mount --bind /tmp/dir1 .
> mount --bind /tmp/dir2 .
> 
> Now you have both /tmp/dir1 and /tmp/dir2 rooted at the same dentry.

Ok. got it!. Agreed. great example!

Thanks,
RP

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux