Re: [patch 1/7] uml: fix syscall table by including $(SUBARCH)'s one, for i386

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 26 April 2005 13:33, Andrew Morton wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
> >  linux-2.6.12-paolo/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S                 |  292
> > ------------ linux-2.6.12-paolo/arch/i386/kernel/syscall_table.S        
> > |  291 +++++++++++
>
> gack.  Any time anyone touches the syscall tables I have to delicately
> rework 8,000 perfctr patches.
>
> So I folded all the perfctr patches into a single patch for now.  Later
> I'll split it out into core and architectures.
Possibly splitting away the "syscall table change" for i386 (which is the only 
one being impacted) and having the two versions (pre- and post- the other 
patches) would help...
-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux