On 4/28/05, Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 05:38:40PM +0900, aq wrote: > > I dont see why we should keep a file in kernel tree without using it > > (since the patch removes "source xfs/Kconfig). Anyway, here is another > > patch that doesnt remove fs/xfs/Kconfig. > > No, you should not remove usage of it either. > OK, here is another patch. It is up to Andrew to pick the approriate. But I still prefer the first patch, which provides both consistency in interface and configuration. What this patch does: - Remove "menu" directive from fs/xfs/Kconfig, so XFS configuration is done in the same screen as other filesystems. - Move "config XFS_EXPORT " to the bottom, so the menu items aligns better and consistent with others. # diffstat makefile.fs3.patch Kconfig | 11 ++++------- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) Signed-off-by: Nguyen Anh Quynh <[email protected]>
Attachment:
makefile.fs3.patch
Description: Binary data
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] fs/Kconfig: more consistent configuration of XFS
- From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fs/Kconfig: more consistent configuration of XFS
- References:
- [PATCH] fs/Kconfig: more consistent configuration of XFS
- From: aq <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fs/Kconfig: more consistent configuration of XFS
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fs/Kconfig: more consistent configuration of XFS
- From: aq <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fs/Kconfig: more consistent configuration of XFS
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] fs/Kconfig: more consistent configuration of XFS
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Linux VM hooks for advanced RDMA NICs
- Next by Date: Re: Again: UML on s390 (31Bit)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] fs/Kconfig: more consistent configuration of XFS
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] fs/Kconfig: more consistent configuration of XFS
- Index(es):